Francine Ly's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)
Key
Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.
Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.
Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.
Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.
Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.
Francine Ly has provided voters with clear stances on key issues by responding to the 2024 Political Courage Test.
Texas Congressional Election 2024 Political Courage Test
| Pro-choice | Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade? | ||
| I do not support the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. I believe that maintaining the precedent set by Roe v. Wade is crucial for protecting women's reproductive rights and ensuring access to safe and legal abortion services. Overturning it could have serious implications for women's autonomy and their ability to make personal healthcare decisions. It is important to uphold a woman's right to choose while also promoting comprehensive reproductive health education and services to address the underlying factors that contribute to unplanned pregnancies. | |||
| Yes | Do you support expanding federal funding to support social safety net programs such as Social Security and Medicare? | ||
| No | Do you support a decrease in income taxes in order to balance the budget? | ||
| Yes | Do you support a wealth tax in order to pay for public programs? | ||
| I believe that reducing income taxes might compromise the government's ability to generate sufficient revenue for essential public services and programs. Instead, we should focus on a more balanced approach, exploring ways to increase revenue through fair taxation and addressing loopholes, while also identifying areas of government spending that could be optimized or reduced to achieve a balanced budget without compromising essential services. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations, unions, and individuals? | ||
| Yes, I support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations, unions, and individuals. Implementing effective regulations is essential to ensure transparency, fairness, and prevent undue influence in the political process. By imposing limits on indirect campaign contributions, we can strive to create a level playing field, reduce the potential for corruption, and uphold the principles of a democratic system where the voices of all citizens are heard, rather than being disproportionately influenced by powerful entities. | |||
| Yes | Do you support protecting government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct? | ||
| I support the idea of limiting qualified immunity for government officials, including law enforcement officers, in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct. While it is crucial to ensure that public servants can perform their duties without constant fear of legal action, overly broad immunity can lead to a lack of accountability. By striking a balance and defining clear limits on qualified immunity, we can hold government officials accountable for their actions while still providing them with the necessary protection to carry out their duties. This approach helps maintain a fair and just system, promoting transparency and trust between citizens and those responsible for upholding the law. | |||
| No | Do you support increasing defense spending? | ||
| I believe it is essential to maintain the current level of defense spending rather than increasing it. While national security is paramount, it's crucial to carefully evaluate the allocation of resources and prioritize efficiency in defense spending. By maintaining funding at the current levels, we can encourage a thorough review of defense budgets to identify areas of improvement, eliminate wasteful spending, and ensure that taxpayer dollars are used effectively to address evolving security challenges. This approach allows for a balanced and responsible management of resources without unnecessarily escalating defense expenditures. | |||
| Yes | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth (e.g. grants, tax incentives)? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the federal government increasing funding for affordable housing programs? | ||
| No | Do you support the federal government taking action, beyond those of the Federal Reserve, to alleviate inflation? | ||
| Strategic investments in infrastructure, education, research and development, and other key sectors can stimulate economic activity, create jobs, and enhance overall productivity. By providing grants and tax incentives, the government can encourage businesses to innovate, expand, and contribute to economic development. It's crucial to strike a balance, ensuring that spending is targeted and efficient, with a focus on long-term benefits for both businesses and individuals, fostering a robust and sustainable economic environment. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the forgiveness of federal student loan debt? | ||
| I support the forgiveness of federal student loan debt. The burden of student loans can hinder individuals from pursuing opportunities, such as homeownership, starting a family, or investing in their future. By forgiving federal student loan debt, we can alleviate financial strain on many individuals, allowing them to contribute more actively to the economy and fostering a more equitable society. It's important to explore fair and targeted approaches to student loan forgiveness to ensure a balanced and effective solution. | |||
| Yes | Do you support requiring a government-issued identification in order to vote at the polls? | ||
| Implementing such a requirement helps ensure the integrity of the electoral process by verifying the identity of voters and preventing potential instances of fraud. A secure identification system promotes trust in the democratic system and protects the principle of one person, one vote. It's crucial to simultaneously address any challenges related to accessibility and provide measures to ensure that obtaining the necessary identification is feasible for all eligible voters. | |||
| Yes | Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)? | ||
| No | Do you support the federal government allowing permits for drilling on public lands? | ||
| I support government funding for the development of renewable energy, including solar, wind, and geo-thermal projects. Investing in renewable energy is crucial for addressing environmental concerns, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and mitigating the impacts of climate change. Government funding can play a pivotal role in advancing research, technology, and infrastructure in the renewable energy sector. However, I oppose the federal government allowing permits for drilling on public lands. While energy development is essential, permitting drilling on public lands can have detrimental environmental consequences, including habitat destruction and the risk of pollution. It is important to prioritize sustainable and environmentally friendly energy sources while exploring alternatives to drilling on public lands. | |||
| Yes | Do you generally support gun-control legislation (e.g. red flag laws, boyfriend loopholes)? | ||
| I generally support gun-control legislation, including measures such as red flag laws and closing loopholes like the "boyfriend loophole." Red flag laws empower authorities to temporarily restrict an individual's access to firearms if they pose a credible risk to themselves or others, enhancing public safety. Closing loopholes, such as the "boyfriend loophole," which allows certain individuals convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors to access firearms, is crucial for preventing gun violence and protecting potential victims. Striking a balance between individual rights and public safety is essential in crafting effective and responsible gun-control policies. | |||
| Yes | Do you support a government-run (e.g. single-payer) healthcare program, such as Medicare-for-All? | ||
| Yes | Do you support expanding paid family AND/OR medical leave benefits (e.g. maternity leave)? | ||
| Yes | Should the government be able to regulate the cost of prescription drugs? | ||
| Yes | Do you support increasing security along the southern US border? | ||
| No | Do you support requiring immigrants to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship, regardless of their immigration status? | ||
| I oppose requiring immigrants to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship, regardless of their immigration status. Such a policy would impose unnecessary hardships on individuals who have already established roots in the country and may have contributed positively to their communities. It is more practical and humane to develop immigration policies that provide a pathway to citizenship for individuals already residing in the country, allowing them to contribute fully to society without the need for forced returns. Comprehensive and fair immigration reform should consider the complexities of individual cases and promote a more inclusive and compassionate approach. | |||
| Yes | Do you support economic intervention as a means of resolving international conflicts? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the US providing increased offensive military aid to Ukraine? | ||
| I support economic intervention as a means of resolving international conflicts. Utilizing economic tools, such as sanctions or incentives, can be an effective diplomatic strategy to influence the behavior of nations engaged in conflict. Economic intervention can create pressure for positive change, promote adherence to international norms, and encourage peaceful resolutions. However, it is essential to carefully consider the specific context and consequences of economic interventions to ensure they are targeted, proportionate, and conducive to long-term stability and cooperation. | |||
| No | Do you generally support increased regulations on social media companies (e.g. Tik Tok, Facebook, etc.)? | ||
| In addition to personal responsibility, I generally support increased regulations on social media companies like TikTok and Facebook. The rapid growth of these platforms has raised concerns about issues such as user privacy, the spread of misinformation, and the potential for manipulation. Increased regulations can help address these challenges, ensuring that social media companies prioritize user safety, data protection, and content accuracy. Striking a balance between innovation and responsible oversight is crucial to harness the positive aspects of social media while mitigating potential harms to individuals and society. | |||
| When elected, my primary focus would be on stimulating economic growth through targeted investments in infrastructure, renewable energy, and technology, with a commitment to simplifying the tax code to promote fairness and encourage small business growth. Additionally, I aim to prioritize sustainable development by advocating for policies that transition toward clean energy, support conservation efforts, and foster eco-friendly practices across industries. Funding for these initiatives would involve a thorough review of government expenditures, redirecting funds to priority areas, exploring public-private partnerships, and attracting foreign direct investment. Lastly, I would address healthcare accessibility by advocating for the expansion of infrastructure, affordable medications, and preventive care, with funding derived from cost-saving measures within the healthcare system, negotiations on drug prices, and public-private collaborations in healthcare delivery. This comprehensive approach ensures a balanced strategy for immediate impact and long-term sustainability. |
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.